Economic transformation in the twenty-first century increasingly unfolds under conditions of heightened uncertainty, structural volatility, and overlapping systemic pressures. While contemporary research widely employs metaphor-based frameworks such as the “Black Swan” and the “Grey Rhino” to conceptualize disruption and risk, these approaches remain insufficient for explaining a recurring empirical phenomenon: the persistent failure of decision-making systems to act upon visible, repeatedly articulated, and institutionally acknowledged systemic risks. This gap becomes particularly consequential in transformation contexts, where delayed responses convert manageable pressures into destabilizing crises. This paper introduces the Blue Elephant as a governance-condition construct describing situations in which systemic risks are highly visible and formally recognized, yet remain structurally under-addressed due to persistent failures in translating recognized knowledge into transformation-level action. The Blue Elephant is conceptualized not as an event category nor as a probabilistic anomaly, but as a state of systemic misalignment between knowledge and action–a knowledge–action gap–in which available and institutionalized risk information fails to activate coordinated structural response. Ontologically, the concept captures a condition of recognized-but-discounted reality, shaped by institutional inertia, incentive misalignment, coordination failures, and normalization narratives that neutralize transformation governance. A central analytical contribution of the paper is the distinction between risk management and transformation governance, demonstrating that the Blue Elephant emerges precisely where formally recognized risks can no longer be addressed within existing institutional and strategic frameworks without structural reconfiguration. By reframing visible systemic pressure as a transformation-triggering condition rather than an external shock, the Blue Elephant provides a diagnostic framework for analyzing why known risks culminate either in crisis-forced restructuring or, under conditions of timely governance intervention, in coordinated renewal and adaptive outcomes. The study offers a conceptual foundation for future comparative and longitudinal research on systemic transformation under uncertainty, including empirical testing through governance-level indicators.

Citation:

Namliiev, Y. (2025). ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY: THE BLUE ELEPHANT AS A GOVERNANCE-CONDITION CONSTRUCT. International Interdisciplinary Scientific Journal “Expert”, 2(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.62034/2815-5300/2025-v2-i1-007

Full text article available at: https://scientific-journal.expert/archives/2025-v2-i1-007

plus-circle Add Review

comment

Reviews